An Information Security Place

Commentary on the State of Information Security

Archive for the 'Stolen computer' Category...

Filed under Data theft, Security, Stolen computer

From SANS Newsbites Volume 9 Number 8. This goes to prove that this was probably the biggest issue of 2006 and will keep on being big in 2007.

Crazy stuff.

TOP OF THE NEWS
–Former Michigan County Treasurer Allegedly Embezzled State Funds to
Pay Nigerian 419 Scammers
(25, 24 & 17 January 2007)
Former Alcona County (Michigan) Treasurer Thomas Katona has been arraigned on nine felony counts of embezzlement and one felony count of forgery for allegedly embezzling state funds to the tune of US $1.2 million; some of the money was allegedly sent to 419 fraudsters in Nigeria. Authorities became aware of the situation when a local bank alerted them to unauthorized wire transfers Katona had directed. Bank officials had cautioned Katona on several occasions that he was falling for a scam, but he ignored their warnings. Katona also allegedly lost more than US $72,000 of his own money in the scam.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/25/treasurer_accused/print.html
http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=UKVFNGXFCRYXIQSNDLPCKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=197000242
http://www.michigan.gov/ag/0,1607,7-164-34739_34811-160250–,00.html
[Editor's Note (Schultz): It is hard to understand how someone who ostensibly is an otherwise intelligent, responsible person could allegedly have fallen for such a scam in such a big way. This shows that despite the fact that 419 scams have lost much of their lustre, they nevertheless still pose a high level of risk.
(Liston): The common misconception is that 419 scams (and their ilk) are aimed at unintelligent victims. Mr. Katona, no doubt, saw the prospect of the 419 "windfall" as a way to cover up his alleged embezzlement, and let greed and desperation overwhelm common sense. Remember: scams are aimed at other human weaknesses -- not "stupidity."
(Grefer): FTC and State Department web sites provide additional guidance at:
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/nigeralrt.htm
http://www.state.gov/www/regions/africa/naffpub.pdf
(Shpantzer): These scams are profitable
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/02/money_launderer_caught/ and have resulted in domestic violence http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/20/419_shooting/ and kidnappings/ransom/killings of those who travel to Nigeria to close 'deals' with the scammers.]

–Class Action Suit Files Against Chicago Board of Elections for Data Exposure
(23 January 2007)
A class-action lawsuit has been filed against the Chicago Board of Elections for sending out more than 100 CDs with sensitive, personally identifiable voter information to city aldermen and ward committeemen.
“The suit … alleges the board violated the Illinois Personal Information Protection Act” and seeks unspecified compensation for all Chicago voters whose Social Security numbers (SSNs) were compromised.
Other data on the CDs include dates of birth, addresses and phone numbers. The board is making efforts to get the disks back, but a board spokesperson maintains there have been no reports of associated identity fraud since the disks were sent out more than three years ago. The board is required by law to notify voters about the incident, but it plans to make the notification through advertising rather than by contacting each voter individually. The Personal Information Protection Act allows for this sort of notification; see Section 10 (c).
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/224519,CST-NWS-data23.article
Text of Illinois Personal Information Protection Act:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/fulltext.asp?Name=094-0036&print=true
[Editor's Note (Liston): It is interesting to see the government's response to its own error and contrast that with the what we can only assume would've been the reaction if this had been a private firm's mistake.
(Shpantzer): This mirrors this week's leak investigation of the entire Israeli population data being given to the political parties in Israel, per Israeli law, facilitating democracy and election fairness. Where else is this happening, and what's being done about this unintended consequence?]

–Data Stolen from TJX Has Been Used to Commit Fraud
(25 & 24 January 2007)
The Massachusetts Bankers Association says customer data stolen in the TJX computer intrusion have been used in fraudulent activity. Close to 60 banks in Massachusetts have been contacted by credit and debit card companies regarding fraudulent activity on compromised debit and credit
cards. Banks in other states, including Vermont, Wisconsin and New
Mexico have reported issuing new cards. Canadian cardholders have been hit by fraud as well.
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/01/24/ap3359602.html
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/01/24/ap3357843.html
http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/55831.html
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070125.WINNERS25/TPStory/National
http://www.postcrescent.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070124/APC03/701240643/1888/APCbusiness

–Delay In Reporting Xerox Laptop Loss Leads To Damage To Employees
(22 January 2007)
A laptop computer stolen from a Xerox human resources manager’s car in August 2006 holds information belonging to an unknown number of Xerox employees; nearly 300 employees received letters notifying them of the theft four months after the fact. Some of the employees had experienced credit problems in the interim; for instance, one individual said several cell phone accounts were opened in his name in the fall of 2006.
A spokesperson defended the company’s decision to delay notification, saying they wanted to determine whether any personal information was on the computer.
http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_012207_news_xerox_theft.cde8339.html

Vet

Posted by Michael Farnum on Friday, January 26th, 2007

Filed under Security, Stolen computer

 

The VA is now buying encryption software for their  computers, handhelds, and other mobile devices.  This makes me wonder about a few things:

  1. Are they also installing it on their subcontractor’s computers?  The last theft of VA data happened at Unisys, not at the VA.  How are they going to handle that?
  2. Have they EVER done a risk analysis?  I ask this because it would be interesting to see what the analysis said about remote laptops, computers, etc. before the thefts.  Did it show there was risk of this happening?  Did they actually weigh the risk and decide it wasn’t a big deal?
  3. My suspicion is that they never ran a risk analysis.  So have they run one now?  Are they just knee-jerking?  Was this process under way before the last theft, or have they gone about this the right way and they just have bad timing?

Even though a risk analysis is always needed, the results are not always correct.  Even if you go about the process in the most scientific manner, you always need to plan for contingencies and the possibilities that your results are either not right or the smallest risks will still happen.

In this case, if the VA did run a risk analysis before the thefts, then they either ignored this risk or deemed it not enough of a risk to worry about.  Though we see it as an obvious risk, and though the many, many stories of laptop theft happening out there before the VA incident make it even more obvious, the VA still did nothing.  That’s why I think they either never had the analysis done, or they simply did one to fulfill requirements then ignored the results.  Both are deplorable practices.

I would really like to see some better disclosure from the VA.  Don’t give me the results of your risk analysis.  Just let us know that you are performing one.  Just like this event, make an announcement that you have a company coming in to help with this and name the company.  Even though you have an obvious hole with the laptops and desktops, you still need to perform your due diligence in making your security holistic  Do not just piece some security measures together to make everything look good to the public.

Vet

Posted by Michael Farnum on Monday, August 14th, 2006

Filed under Crime, Due Diligence, Security, Stolen computer

…because you can read about it in the news, because it generally happens for the same reason (stupidity, mainly), and I get tired or writing about it.  And the same would be the case on this new VA stolen desktop (also read here), except that this is twice for the VA, and I think this one holds more importance.  Why?  Glad you asked!

  1. Because this one, on the surface, seems like a targeted attack.  This was not an average house robbery.  This was stolen from a Unisys facility that was doing insurance collections for the VA.  Far be it from me to start FUD, but I think there was some definite desire for this desktop because of the data it held (why was the data on a desktop, anyway???)
  2. This brings forward the point that you are just as responsible for your contractors security as you are your own.  The theft did not actually happen on a VA facility, but you can’t schluff off due diligence.

Vet

Posted by Michael Farnum on Tuesday, August 8th, 2006