<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why IDS will be around</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/08/24/why-ids-will-be-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/08/24/why-ids-will-be-around/</link>
	<description>Commentary on the State of Information Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:13:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: www.andrewhay.ca &#187; Suggested Blog Reading - Wednesday August 29th, 2007</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/08/24/why-ids-will-be-around/comment-page-1/#comment-19740</link>
		<dc:creator>www.andrewhay.ca &#187; Suggested Blog Reading - Wednesday August 29th, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/08/24/why-ids-will-be-around/#comment-19740</guid>
		<description>[...] Why IDS will be around - So IDS isn&#8217;t dead now?   OK, here’s the post I promised on why I agree that IDS is not dead and won’t be for a while. What it all essentially comes down to is reality. In theory, the way anyone’s network should be designed is in the fashion of the Core-Distribution-Access methodology. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why IDS will be around &#8211; So IDS isn&#8217;t dead now?   OK, here’s the post I promised on why I agree that IDS is not dead and won’t be for a while. What it all essentially comes down to is reality. In theory, the way anyone’s network should be designed is in the fashion of the Core-Distribution-Access methodology. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/08/24/why-ids-will-be-around/comment-page-1/#comment-19716</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/08/24/why-ids-will-be-around/#comment-19716</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of people with their noses closer to the grindstone (or wires) quietly shrugged at the declaration of the IDS being dead, and knew better. It was bait, really, that&#039;s about it. Bait and sensationalism for vendorland and journalists and analysts.

I&#039;m in full agreement, the IDS is not going anywhere. It is a fundamental building block of network security. When you assume prevention will eventually fail at some point (a &quot;law&quot; in security, imo), you need to be able to detect when that happens. While some IDS systems get complex (like IPS and later when it rolls into the firewall), there is still that need for basic IDS functions in various places on the networks.

And you&#039;re right! That&#039;s reality!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of people with their noses closer to the grindstone (or wires) quietly shrugged at the declaration of the IDS being dead, and knew better. It was bait, really, that&#8217;s about it. Bait and sensationalism for vendorland and journalists and analysts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in full agreement, the IDS is not going anywhere. It is a fundamental building block of network security. When you assume prevention will eventually fail at some point (a &#8220;law&#8221; in security, imo), you need to be able to detect when that happens. While some IDS systems get complex (like IPS and later when it rolls into the firewall), there is still that need for basic IDS functions in various places on the networks.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right! That&#8217;s reality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around the Security Blogosphere in 30 seconds! &#171; Observations of a digitally enlightened mind</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/08/24/why-ids-will-be-around/comment-page-1/#comment-19715</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the Security Blogosphere in 30 seconds! &#171; Observations of a digitally enlightened mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/08/24/why-ids-will-be-around/#comment-19715</guid>
		<description>[...] rumors of the IDS death have been greatly exaggerated as Farnum (here), Bejtilch (here), and grumpy smurf (here) have whipped out the acoustic guitars, patchoulli/sage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rumors of the IDS death have been greatly exaggerated as Farnum (here), Bejtilch (here), and grumpy smurf (here) have whipped out the acoustic guitars, patchoulli/sage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
