<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My one day at TRISC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/05/17/my-one-day-at-trisc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/05/17/my-one-day-at-trisc/</link>
	<description>Commentary on the State of Information Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:13:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Landoll</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/05/17/my-one-day-at-trisc/comment-page-1/#comment-20059</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Landoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/05/17/my-one-day-at-trisc/#comment-20059</guid>
		<description>As the author of the &quot;child molestor-to-black hat&quot; opinion let me add to the debate. (To be honest I do see both sides, but debate is fun none-the-less). In the field of security consulting and security testing of corporate systems it is arguably negligent to expose a client&#039;s system to an untrustworthy individual. Yes, everyone makes mistakes, but that doesn&#039;t stop hiring practices such as a) you can&#039;t be a police officer if you have committed a felony b) you can get turned down for a bus driver slot if you have been caught driving druck, or c) you cannot have a job handling money if you have been convicted of embesslement. Such practices are simply a reasonable precaution and a method for increasing the chance that trustworthy individuals are places in trust-needy positions. 

As far as sticking an &quot;ex-hacker&quot; in a lab to crank out more exploits, I think they are very well qualified for that position. But if you are a manager or owner of a security consulting practice you need to consider if exposing your clients to a known risk is prudent or defendable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the author of the &#8220;child molestor-to-black hat&#8221; opinion let me add to the debate. (To be honest I do see both sides, but debate is fun none-the-less). In the field of security consulting and security testing of corporate systems it is arguably negligent to expose a client&#8217;s system to an untrustworthy individual. Yes, everyone makes mistakes, but that doesn&#8217;t stop hiring practices such as a) you can&#8217;t be a police officer if you have committed a felony b) you can get turned down for a bus driver slot if you have been caught driving druck, or c) you cannot have a job handling money if you have been convicted of embesslement. Such practices are simply a reasonable precaution and a method for increasing the chance that trustworthy individuals are places in trust-needy positions. </p>
<p>As far as sticking an &#8220;ex-hacker&#8221; in a lab to crank out more exploits, I think they are very well qualified for that position. But if you are a manager or owner of a security consulting practice you need to consider if exposing your clients to a known risk is prudent or defendable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Information Security Place &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Simple Nomad to talk about fingerprinting IDS/IPS @ IT Security World</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/05/17/my-one-day-at-trisc/comment-page-1/#comment-19966</link>
		<dc:creator>An Information Security Place &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Simple Nomad to talk about fingerprinting IDS/IPS @ IT Security World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/05/17/my-one-day-at-trisc/#comment-19966</guid>
		<description>[...] more about IDS/IPS evasion and fingerprinting&#160;at IT Security World in San Francisco.&#160; I wrote about this earlier this year when Simple Nomad presented some of his findings at TRISC.&#160; It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more about IDS/IPS evasion and fingerprinting&nbsp;at IT Security World in San Francisco.&nbsp; I wrote about this earlier this year when Simple Nomad presented some of his findings at TRISC.&nbsp; It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/05/17/my-one-day-at-trisc/comment-page-1/#comment-19163</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/05/17/my-one-day-at-trisc/#comment-19163</guid>
		<description>The child molester-to-black hat is a bit of an extreme comparison.

Honestly, it is accepted that businesses will treat convicted criminals differently, but beyond that, if someone professes to be a black hat in his personal time, that shouldn&#039;t be something he is necessarily judged by.

As for less-than-completely-reputable , you&#039;re right, that&#039;s a lot of talent that could be going to waste (and let&#039;s face it, SOMEONE will snap up talent, including your competitors). But I think the biggest thing is to allow people to change and grow and be less of a villain. We&#039;ve all made mistakes of varying degrees and it just doesn&#039;t sit well with me to say once a hacker (in that awesome negative connotation of the term...ugh) always a hacker. If my parents judged me forever and ever based on my sins as a kid...and so on. :)

I think our industry is especially sensitive to this since it really takes a mind that knows how to break things to be able to know how to secure them. Can you really secure wireless without knowing how to be bad on a wireless network that you don&#039;t own? That&#039;s arguable, but I really believe (kinda like CTF and other Cyberdefense competitions) that what amounts to field experience goes a long, long way in our area.

Then again, there are those less-than-completely-reputable hackers who will steal from the cupboard when you&#039;re not looking to...buyer beware!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The child molester-to-black hat is a bit of an extreme comparison.</p>
<p>Honestly, it is accepted that businesses will treat convicted criminals differently, but beyond that, if someone professes to be a black hat in his personal time, that shouldn&#8217;t be something he is necessarily judged by.</p>
<p>As for less-than-completely-reputable , you&#8217;re right, that&#8217;s a lot of talent that could be going to waste (and let&#8217;s face it, SOMEONE will snap up talent, including your competitors). But I think the biggest thing is to allow people to change and grow and be less of a villain. We&#8217;ve all made mistakes of varying degrees and it just doesn&#8217;t sit well with me to say once a hacker (in that awesome negative connotation of the term&#8230;ugh) always a hacker. If my parents judged me forever and ever based on my sins as a kid&#8230;and so on. <img src='http://infosecplace.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think our industry is especially sensitive to this since it really takes a mind that knows how to break things to be able to know how to secure them. Can you really secure wireless without knowing how to be bad on a wireless network that you don&#8217;t own? That&#8217;s arguable, but I really believe (kinda like CTF and other Cyberdefense competitions) that what amounts to field experience goes a long, long way in our area.</p>
<p>Then again, there are those less-than-completely-reputable hackers who will steal from the cupboard when you&#8217;re not looking to&#8230;buyer beware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
