<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why aren&#8217;t NAC vendors buying patch management companies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/10/05/why-arent-nac-vendors-buying-patch-management-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/10/05/why-arent-nac-vendors-buying-patch-management-companies/</link>
	<description>Commentary on the State of Information Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:22:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark macauley</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/10/05/why-arent-nac-vendors-buying-patch-management-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-3603</link>
		<dc:creator>mark macauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/10/05/why-arent-nac-vendors-buying-patch-management-companies/#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>Most of the NAC vendors are using one of two drivers/shims for their solution - Checkpoint or Opswat. Those seem to be the big ones, at least for the NAC vendors who have an appliance component to their offering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the NAC vendors are using one of two drivers/shims for their solution &#8211; Checkpoint or Opswat. Those seem to be the big ones, at least for the NAC vendors who have an appliance component to their offering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Shimel</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/10/05/why-arent-nac-vendors-buying-patch-management-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Shimel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/10/05/why-arent-nac-vendors-buying-patch-management-companies/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Michael - I agree remediation working with NAC is very powerful.  In fact we have Safe Access our NAC solution integrates and is working with Citadel, Big Fix and MS SMS. I think McAfee is more interested in using Citadel with their Foundstone/Preventsys vulnerability system at this point than NAC.  Their NAC program still has a lot of growing up to do.  Unless working for a McAfee partner has brought you over to the dark side ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael &#8211; I agree remediation working with NAC is very powerful.  In fact we have Safe Access our NAC solution integrates and is working with Citadel, Big Fix and MS SMS. I think McAfee is more interested in using Citadel with their Foundstone/Preventsys vulnerability system at this point than NAC.  Their NAC program still has a lot of growing up to do.  Unless working for a McAfee partner has brought you over to the dark side <img src='http://infosecplace.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

