<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it the tool or the crook that is to blame?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/07/18/is-it-the-tool-or-the-crook-that-is-to-blame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/07/18/is-it-the-tool-or-the-crook-that-is-to-blame/</link>
	<description>Commentary on the State of Information Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:13:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/07/18/is-it-the-tool-or-the-crook-that-is-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/?p=146#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I agree with Alan on this one as well, if the intent was to actually blame Open Source. After I posted about this on my blog I realized that McAfee &quot;may&quot; have meant to comment on what appears to be a more &quot;collaborative&quot; environment that these malware writers operate in. That may be a more defensible position. 

I actually have more of an issue with the way McAfee is complaining about Full Disclosure (not the mailing list) methods. This is more than a little ironic considering their recent covert behavior around patching the ePolicy hole.

--Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Alan on this one as well, if the intent was to actually blame Open Source. After I posted about this on my blog I realized that McAfee &#8220;may&#8221; have meant to comment on what appears to be a more &#8220;collaborative&#8221; environment that these malware writers operate in. That may be a more defensible position. </p>
<p>I actually have more of an issue with the way McAfee is complaining about Full Disclosure (not the mailing list) methods. This is more than a little ironic considering their recent covert behavior around patching the ePolicy hole.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
