<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Bianco on laptop encryption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/07/06/david-bianco-on-laptop-encryption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/07/06/david-bianco-on-laptop-encryption/</link>
	<description>Commentary on the State of Information Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:22:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joat</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/07/06/david-bianco-on-laptop-encryption/comment-page-1/#comment-19399</link>
		<dc:creator>joat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 04:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/?p=134#comment-19399</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a much later date (and much more data has been exposed).  I&#039;d have to agree with both Joel and David (I will admit to knowing David).  Given the amount of data that&#039;s been exposed in the past year via laptop loss/theft, I think it&#039;s a much better idea to force all users to process the data remotely, rather than allowing them to store it locally, encrypted or not.  Then again, there&#039;s a certain class of data that should not be accessed/processed outside of a secured enclave, for any reason.

- joat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a much later date (and much more data has been exposed).  I&#8217;d have to agree with both Joel and David (I will admit to knowing David).  Given the amount of data that&#8217;s been exposed in the past year via laptop loss/theft, I think it&#8217;s a much better idea to force all users to process the data remotely, rather than allowing them to store it locally, encrypted or not.  Then again, there&#8217;s a certain class of data that should not be accessed/processed outside of a secured enclave, for any reason.</p>
<p>- joat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://infosecplace.com/blog/2006/07/06/david-bianco-on-laptop-encryption/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecplace.com/blog/?p=134#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with both of you.  I can see points for both sides of the conversation, I use a laptop for everyday use, so, more or less it &lt;I&gt;is&lt;/I&gt; my desktop.

However, I store a majority of my information back at my home &quot;base&quot;, however, without the information stored on my laptop, I don&#039;t know how I would do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with both of you.  I can see points for both sides of the conversation, I use a laptop for everyday use, so, more or less it <i>is</i> my desktop.</p>
<p>However, I store a majority of my information back at my home &#8220;base&#8221;, however, without the information stored on my laptop, I don&#8217;t know how I would do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

